When I was teaching junior high school students in American studies, one students asked me, "Why do you always answer a question with a question?" I hadn't realized that I did this, and I asked the student, "Why do you think I do that?" She rolled her eyes and said, "See!" I laughed as though I were being clever, but really I was just doing what I apparently always did, answering a question with a question.
Today in church I noticed that I had internalized the WWJD (What would Jesus do) mantra of the time. Jesus responded to questions with questions, too.
In Luke 10, for example, an expert of the Law asks Jesus, "Teacher, what must I do to inherit everlasting life?" and Jesus answers, "What is written in the law? How do you read it?" I've mostly heard that Jesus was clever at getting out of a trap, but really, he's just being a teacher, a really good one as he answers a question with not one but two questions.
Later the expert of the Law presses, "And just who is my neighbor?" Using another teaching technique that I also used, Jesus answered with a story (thus proving that he was indeed a Southerner) about a man who's hurt on the side of the road and two religious men who pass him by and the third, a Samaritan, who cares for him. A good teacher, Jesus follows his story with a question, "Which of these three, in your opinion, was the neighbor to the traveler who fell in with the robbers?"
Our pastor Karla picked up on the Southern theme as she reflected on another Biblical Southerner, the prophet Amos, who preached to the northerners, the Yankees of his time and place. "He was a brave Southern man preaching to a reluctant Northern crowd." (I'm pretty sure her message was that Southern hicks--her word, not mine--are Yankees' neighbors, too.)
In this reflection on "Who is my neighbor?" Karla was thinking especially about Salvadorans she met recently in Guarjila, a rural Salvadoran town with which our church has a sister relationship. In the reflection, she challenged us to think about who we see as our neighbors in this time when the gap between rich and poor is getting "deeper....wider." I usually hear that the gap is getting wider, but I appreciate this new image of the gap getting deeper.
After all, I can walk easily across a wide field that separates me from my neighbor, but crossing a deep cravasse is harder to imagine. The image reminds me that crossing over that gap requires not just a little effort, but some tools and ways of thinking that I don't now possess.
After the sermon and some prayers, we sang the hymn, "Help Us Accept Each Other," and I was particularly drawn to the line, "Teach us to care for people, for all, not just for some, to love them as we find them, or as they may become."
The line and Karla's reflection called to mind another group of people who I do not always recognize as my neighbor: the most down and out drug addicts whose lives are described in a book by a doctor who worked with a drug-addicted community in Vancouver, BC. (The book is In the Realm of Hungry Ghosts, and I recommend it if you're up for an intense non-fiction read.)
The doctor reflects on his role and the philosophy of the group with whom he works to serve the people he meets as they are, helping to ease their lives rather than trying to change them. As he tells some of their stories of physical and sexual abuse, of abandonment and violence, he asks who he is to judge them, to think that he knows a better way for them to deal with the trauma of their lives than drug use.
Is there a better way? It's a good question. I also have a friend who was similarly abused and yet has overcome her alcoholism, and I think that she is more whole than the people about whom I am reading. Is it honoring them to let them live their lives as they do, or is it giving up on them? I'm not sure.
The question calls to mind for me Mother Theresa's comment, "If you want to work for the poor, live with the poor."
In choosing to work among this community of people living with addictions--many in addition to mental illness, PTSD, debilitating diseases like AIDS...--the good doctor has chosen to live among the people he serves...or at least to work among them; he actually lives in another neighborhood.
How can I judge anyone whose life I have not lived? It is too easy to say that I cannot, since I do judge adults, for example, who violate children.
Perhaps the better question is, "Who is my neighbor?" If my neighbor is really among the least of these, and I believe my neighbor is, then there are too many of my neighbors in this world that I do not know, and thus their concerns are not as urgent to me as they would be otherwise.
But I cannot know everyone's story, so what I am to do? That's the question I'll leave you with today. Maybe you'll respond. That would be great. Then maybe both you and I can learn something from this.
Teacher Mary
"For me a brain tumor and its treatments are not a pause in the adventure of life, but instead a part of the adventure of life." Mary has survived big hair, a brain tumor, coming out, distressed bowel syndrome, hallucinations, radiation, and a car wreck. Here Mary takes us from public transportation horrors to the joys of sharing life with you. Though you probably won't want to have a brain tumor; you will wish that you could see the world through Mary's eyes. Sister Jen
A Photograph of me without me in it
Sunday, July 28, 2013
Monday, July 22, 2013
Telling Stories
This morning, my yoga teacher Dawn started class with a dharma talk as she always does. In dharma talks, the Samarya Center teachers connect stories from their lives to a guide for living in the first and second limbs of yoga.
This month's concept is svadhyaya, a Sanscrit word that means study of self and of religious texts. An English major in college and a Language Arts teacher for decades, I'm pretty good with studying religious texts. but because I can be remarkably unaware of myself, I engage especially with this niyama and with my teachers' stories.
Dawn's stories often involve her teenage children. I love these stories because I taught teenagers for so many years and loved to witness their ways of learning about themselves and their world and because Dawn is so earnest in her searching and so humble about her frustrations.
In today's story, Dawn talked about wanting her son to play outside while he wanted to spend hours on the computer. She said, "I realize we are both telling ourselves stories that may have some truth in them..." and then she couldn't help but continue, "but I'm pretty sure most people would agree that my story is right."
Bless her heart. Like the rest of us, she is trying to hear her own story, but it's hard to listen without letting out egos, our insecurities...our humanness get in the way.
I love stories, my own and others'. Not because they tell me about truth in the world but because they tell of the struggle to find truth in the world--and in ourselves.
I am writing a book with the working title, Sharing Our Stories. It is a book of interviews with people who have experienced life-changing health conditions and those in our lives.
“Like Victor Frankl, a concentration
camp survivor and psychiatrist, who wrote Man’s
Search for Meaning, we can’t avoid suffering, but we can find or create
some meaning to survive it and even thrive.”
I think the good doctor’s partly right here. Only partly because I believe my life has meaning without
me looking for it. I’m amazed by that meaning, and I want to celebrate with
others.I recently heard the story of a man going to a guru to ask what the meaning of life is. The guru replied, "Life. Life is the meaning of life." I get that.
The doctor’s question of why I write
interests me more than his answer. Last year, in an interview with a new friend
who has experienced chronic fatigue related to Fibro Myalgia, my friend asked, “Why
do you write?”
Her question got me to thinking again.
At a writers’ retreat two years ago, a
table of women explored a different question together: how do you stay
diligent, writing regularly? These women seemed to be distracted from their
writing, and writing for them was to some extent a chore that required due
diligence. I told them that my struggle is to make sure I live out the other
facets of my life: my struggle is, at times, to not write. (This is not a split
infinitive, so put away your red pen. Not writing is a verb, an action verb,
just as writing is.)
I learned at that lunch that my answer
did not make me popular with the crowd, so I now keep this struggle
to myself when I'm with other writers.
Still, writing for me is a kind of
release and relief. It comes easily, like water from a tap. I feel compelled to
write as I would feel compelled to breathe if I were drowning in water.
Writing, for me, is like breathing under water.
Why? I think it’s because I have
something to say and something to learn. I’m noticing a recurring theme in my writing: life
after disease is not tragic, though many people seem to think it is. I am not
heroic because I aim to live a full life with my disabilities and my awareness
that another tumor could grow at any time. Some people think I’m inspiring, and
I like for people to think I’m inspiring, but the truth is that I’m not
exceptional.
That is what I have to say. What do I have to learn? I'm not sure, but I know it's really important.
For my book, I’ve been
interviewing others with life-changing health conditions and those in our
lives. I want to publish a book of our stories, a book that I have wanted
to read since I began healing from neurosurgery, and I was beginning to see that my life would change. I don’t really want advice. I
want to hear people’s stories, so I am writing a book of stories.That is what I have to say. What do I have to learn? I'm not sure, but I know it's really important.
As I interview people with
life-changing health conditions, with breast cancer, diabetes, addictions,
mental illnesses and so forth, I see that my peeps live meaningful lives.
As my neighbor who has stage IV metastatic breast
cancer said, “The treatments have been hell, but I’ve found out
who my friends are and how much community I have. So there have been gifts. And
I’ve found out that I can get through anything.
“It makes me sad when I meet people who can’t see
the gifts. I wish I could have gotten here without this, but where I am and who
I am are good because of everything I’ve learned from the experience of having
cancer.”
Those of us whose lives have been changed because of
our health, live meaningful lives. That’s what I want anyone who’s diagnosed to
know. That’s what I want everyone else to know.
Why do I want everyone to know this? Because most of
us--facing health conditions or not--experience something we didn’t plan for as children, and though our paths
change, we can live fully. In fact, perhaps many of us need to veer from the
journeys we had planned in order to live fully.
I want everyone to know the hope that I’m experiencing as my life keeps veering from my planned paths. I don’t want people
to fear their lives unfolding. I want my writing to inspire hope. For me and everyone else.
Maybe that’s why I write.
Saturday, July 13, 2013
Broken-hearted
Before I married my husband (in my straight life), Sister
Jen told my mom, “If he breaks her heart, I’ll kill him.” For years, I thought
he had broken my heart. Though I was the one who left the marriage, he was the
first one to fall out of love. It hurts my ego to admit that, but it’s true.
Recently, I have realized that I broke my own heart: I had
been dedicated to the idea of myself as someone who would live a life like my
mother’s, and when I walked away from that marriage I walked away from that vision
of myself into a dark unknown.
This wasn’t the first time I had broken my own heart—in
college I had ended a relationship with a fabulous fellow whom I thought would
be my husband, but I just couldn’t marry him—for reasons that were altogether
unclear to me.
When I left my husband, I established a pattern: I was not
like my mom. If I was not like my mom even when I had the chance to be, who was
I? Part of the answer was that I was a lesbian, an answer that was painful at
the time but that I now know has been such a life-giving gift.
With my leavings, all I seemed to know of myself was in a
whirl that wore me out. Dang, I was tired. Ooff. Air out of a tire tired. Body
as a sack. Head like the clapper in a bell. Chest thud. Tired. That’s what I
wrote in my journal at the time.
The first time I left someone I loved, I wailed. I lost a
lot of weight. I had to hold myself back from hurting myself more seriously
(though I was never suicidal, so I have not experienced that level of pain.) I
ached. The only identity I held onto was my identity as a student.
The second time, the time of my divorce, I also wailed and
ached and shed weight, but this time I never felt tempted to hurt myself. This
time, the identity that I held onto was my identity as a public school teacher,
but even as a teacher I could not achieve what seemed most important to me
without wearing myself out. I had told myself that my students would receive
the same education that my wealthier private school students in Dallas had
received, though I now taught five classes of 35 students instead of four
classes of 18 students. Again: Ooff. Air out of a tire tired.
I worked to lift my body and
spirit to face the dark winter and this dark time in my soul, but I slipped
into an emotional fog nonetheless. I made it through each day, and I think only
Ann saw my struggles, (other than my students and colleagues who noticed how
much weight I was losing), but at night I was so weary that I could not sleep. I
still have the journal where I tried to process my grief. In that journal, I
wrote a letter to God, an almost desperate prayer:
Are you there, God? It’s me, Mary. I feel bone-weary and soul-sad.
Where does this depression come from? If
this sadness could talk, I can imagine what it might say, “I’m here because I’m
always here, and I’m as old as time. I rock like an old woman endlessly
knitting in her chair. Whatever you do or feel, I rock on. I am the pain of
human suffering, caused by human cruelty or the whims of weather and tide. I am
part of what it means to be.” I hear the sadness, God, but I don’t hear you.
Where are you?
At the time, I read in le thi
diem thuy’s novel The Gangster We Are All
Looking For a poetic passage describing a dying school of fish, and I
wondered if my sadness were like that school of fish just before it dies on
shore—darting in the darkness, luminous in the shallow water with the moonlight
creating a mesmerizing, melancholy beauty.
I felt the fish shifting in the
sea of myself, knocking my ribs, tightening my throat, bumping and turning in a
synchronous bounce from my stomach lining. I wondered if they if they would
ever rest. I wondered what must die in me, what would turn its white belly to
the moonlight from the sandy shore.
I talked to God, but I didn’t hear
a response. I grew heavier and heavier. At work, I struggled. I loved teaching
high school students, but the long nights and weekends, the parents and
students, were too much. I was too weary.
I thought, “There must be
another way,” and I left the job I loved, the identity I clung to. In the fall
I hiked and biked on sunny days, and on rainy days I looked for another job.
I finally found a job with an
online educational start-up that demanded little of me and paid me a generous
salary, but that job didn’t embrace my heart as teaching had, so I left to become
a national education reform consultant, working in schools with teachers and
administrators who wanted to create better schools for poor students. Again, I
was generously paid.
In that job, I became
disillusioned with my ability to make a difference at this distance from
students. When I read Mother Theresa’s statement, “If you want to work for the
poor, you must live with the poor,” I decided to return to teaching, this time
working with some of the poorest students in my region.
Like the Grinch’s heart which
grew three sizes in one day, in my new school I felt my heart heal and grow. I was not making a
difference at the structural level—I had given up on finding a way to do
that—but I was making a difference for some (I wish I could say all) students
in my classes and in my school.
Then, I had to leave my students
again, this time before the end of the year because of a brain tumor diagnosis.
Again, my heart broke, and I cried after surgery when my colleague Jill brought me get well
letters from my students. I cried again when my colleague Alexandra brought me
a video of students reading the personal essays that they had been writing when
I left.
After learning to walk, if
unsteadily, again, I returned to schools but not to my own classroom: I worked
with teachers in poor schools who wanted to improve their teaching. Finally, I realized that I could no longer do this either, so I went
to part time and then quit altogether and went on Social Security for people
with Disabilities.
Strangely, in this long process of
finally leaving education, I was not heart-broken. I was at peace, relieved,
sometimes joyful and even ecstatic. I would no longer keep trying to do what I
could not do. My heart began to heal, and I began to consider a new career
where I could make a difference to people who are marginalized, this time as a
therapist for people with life-changing health conditions.
I am now working, slowly,
towards that career. I am taking a two-pronged approach: I am at the School of
Social Work working towards an MSW, and I am writing two books, one about my
life’s change after brain tumors (there was a second one), and one about other
people’s experiences with life-changing health conditions. I crave hearing
other stories that connect to my own, so perhaps others will appreciate these
connections.
I felt guilty about recovering
from my heartbreak and about leaving my career in education. I wrote about this in my last entry. Serendipitously,
however, I am now reading Parker Palmer’s Healing
the Heart of Democracy, and his book is helping me to see my own heartbreaks
in a new way.
Though Parker Palmer has written a book
about civic engagement in political life and not a self-help book, he argues,
“The politics of our time is the ‘politics of the broken-hearted.’” I think I
understand what it means to be broken-hearted.
He writes, “If you hold your
knowledge of self and world whole-heartedly, your heart will at times get
broken by loss, failure, defeat, betrayal, or death.”
“Yes,” I think, “You have my
attention, Parker Palmer. You’re talking to me.”
He continues as if not
interrupted: “What happens next in you and the world around you depends on how your heart breaks.”
“Huh?”
“If it breaks apart into a
thousand pieces, the result may be anger, depression, and disengagement.”
As someone who has three times
experienced dark depressions, Parker Palmer must know what he’s talking
about on an intellectual and on a visceral level.
He continues, “If it breaks open into greater capacities and
contradictions of human experience, the result may be new life.”
Though there have been times
when I have felt like Humpty Dumpty, whom the doctors could not put back
together again, my heart and I are not shattered. I can wonder with Parker
Palmer, “What shall I do with my suffering?”
Parker Palmer assures me, “The
broken-open heart is a source of power as well as compassion—[it gives us] the
power to bring down whatever diminishes us and raise up whatever serves us
well.”
He notes how crucial is the
“habit of the heart” called hope.”
Hope. Hmmm. When I was teaching
at the end of my career, if you had asked me, “What is the most important
lesson that you teach in your Language Arts classes?”, I would have answered,
“Hope,” by which I would have meant a hope that is substantive and powerful,
not a cotton candy hope that is sugary and does not sustain us but melts into
nothingness.
I need this hope now.
Parker Palmer’s exposition gives
me hope. He continues, “Some of what we must learn if democracy is to flourish
comes only from “crossing over” into lives unlike our own, not fleeing from
them in fear but entering into them in trust that an experience of ‘otherness’
can help our closed hearts break open.”
This sort of “crossing over” had been the center point of
my life: I have long loved teaching students whose lives and histories were so
different than my own and have loved meeting people in El Salvador and other
technologically developing countries whose lives and countries are so different
than mine. Now I love hearing people’s stories and connecting with strangers as
I ride the city bus. I love hearing the stories of those people I’m
interviewing about their lives after a serious diagnosis of themselves or
someone in their lives.
Though I am no longer teaching,
I continue along this path, now more intent to share my own story than I was but for, and still intent on hearing and sharing others’ stories. As Parker Palmer (I know the convention is to use
just his last name, but he feels closer to me than that, so I’m adopting the
Southern convention of using two names)…Anyway, as Parker Palmer tells me, “We
are imperfect and broken beings who inhabit an imperfect and broken world. The
genius of the human heart lies in its capacity to use these tensions to
generate insight, energy, new life.”
I want to do that. I want to
generate insight, energy, and new life!
Later in the book, he adds this
assurance, “You go through a long underground passage of grief….But one day you
emerge and discover that because of your
devastating loss, your heart feels more grateful, alive, and loving.”
This is true for me and for most
of the people with serious health conditions whom I have interviewed: we are
more alive because we have grieved. Our hearts, like Robert Frost’s birches (a
great poem to read, if you don’t know it), are bowed and not broken, or in
Parker Palmer’s lexicon, are broken open and not apart.
Again, Parker Palmer has it
right: “A heart that has been consistently exercised through conscious
engagement with suffering is more likely to break open instead of apart. Such a
heart has learned how to flex to hold tension in a way that expands its
capacity for both suffering and joy.”
Thus, my brain tumors…as my
separations years ago, my coming out as a lesbian, and my leaving a long career
in education…have been gifts to me. I do not believe I am tying up my story
with a bow when I say that these experiences of death in life have made me
stronger. I don’t know what I’ll do with this broken heart, but I do believe
that my heart has broken open and not shattered.
“What shall we do with our
heartbreak so that it yields life, not death?” With Blues Traveler, I’ll sing
an optimistic thought:
Life I embrace you,
I shall honor and disgrace you.
Please forgive if I replace you:
You see I'm going through some pain,
But now I see clearly,
And the dawn is coming nearly
And though I'm human and it's early,
I swear I'll never forget again.
Well, to tell the truth, I’ve
forgotten before, and I will forget again. Again my heart will break, and again I
will hunker down to tend to my broken heart. But I’ll emerge, as I am emerging
now. I will engage with my life and the strangers who cross my paths. I will
live, and my open heart will break again.
Perhaps that’s what it means to
live.
Thanks Parker Palmer.
Love,
Mary Edwards
Wednesday, July 10, 2013
Brown M&M Day
If energy is symbolized by M&Ms, which of
course it is, then I awoke with very few M&Ms on Monday, and the ones I did
have were brown. None of them were peanut. Just a few plain brown M&Ms.
My alarm awakened me at 8 am to go on a bike ride
with Ann, but I just couldn't get up, so I reset the alarm for 8:30. Again,
there was no way I could rise, so Ann suggested we just stay home today (bless
her!), and I went back to sleep. At 11 am, I woke up a bit hungry, so I ate
some breakfast (no yoga today) and went back to bed again. When I awoke again
at 4 pm, I felt like my old self (and though my old self keeps getting older, I
enjoy that self more than the one that keeps sleeping.)
Why was I so weary? At the Samarya Center where I
do yoga, we are discussing Svadhyaya, often translated as
"self-study," this month, and this niyama is not my strong point, so
it takes me a lot of energy.
Perhaps I was svadhyaya-ing. I thought
and I thought. (Sounds like a Dr. Seuss character.) The previous two days I had
skipped my naps in an experiment to see if I could make it with less
sleep, and perhaps that partially explained my weariness, but I decided to keep
looking around in the cob-webby corners of my spirit to see if there might be
another reason lurking there.
The previous day, Sunday, I had gone to church and
then to my teachers' writing group (which I love), where I had gotten feedback
on a piece I have written about leaving my career in education. The piece begins in tears but ends cheerfully.
These smart teacher-writers advised me on the
piece. Edie said, "It doesn't have to end happily, to be tied up in a bow
at the end. You could have mixed emotions," and Doug said, "The
question is both what do you take with you and what must you leave
behind."
In response to a different piece years ago, Sister
Jen similarly said, "Your cheeriness is a little hard to believe."
So in those hours I spent sleeping the next day, I
searched, and I searched. Am I really super-depressed and in denial? It seemed
possible. I had worked in education for a fourth of a century and had finally
found a job that met my spirit in a school that served a large number of
students living in poverty, many of them immigrants from the world's poorest
and most violent countries. My students were bright and often delightful. And then I had to leave for brain surgery.
After years teaching in different schools, working
for an educational online company, and consulting for a national education
reform organization, I had finally found work where I felt like I could meet
the needs of at least some students and in this small way make the world a
little more just, a little more peaceful.
And then, I had my first brain tumor and had to
leave the classroom. When I went back, I worked as an instructional coach with
teachers. And then, I had my second brain tumor and had to leave any career in
education altogether.
But as I searched my spirit on Monday, I did not
find a dark corner of hidden depression. I found joy in the fact that I was
still living and could continue to work for social justice in a new field. That
joy I have written about.
I also found a new emotion in response to leaving
my career: relief. I am just being honest here. So yes, really.
I can't think of any U.S. career more important
than a career aimed at educating youth, especially those living in
poverty. (and, more truth-telling, especially the youngest ones.) Helping
change the picture for young people living in poverty has been my life's
mission so far.
So why was I relieved to leave this career when
there's clearly so much more to do? I thought and I thought. It's just so darn
hard for me to see an answer in the socio-economic structure of our country, so
it's hard for me to figure out how I could make a systemic difference.
And if I can't do it, who can? After all, I was
born to privileges, including the privilege of an excellent education. I should
be able to make a difference or at least see how a difference could be made.
And if not me, Bill Gates even threw his smart
people and his wealthy foundation into the project of improving America's high
schools. His foundation focused on the small schools' movement. My partner Ann
was a "coach" for schools trying to make this move, and I worked on
the staff of a large school that divided into small schools, then worked in one
of those small schools (which I loved.) His foundation gave up.
But still, too much was too wrong for too many
people living in poverty in this country, and I had thrown in the towel: I
could make a small difference for some students in this one small school, but
the larger system was still wrong.
While working in this school, I tried to make peace with making a difference in
this community. I adopted the mantra, "Do the right thing, even if doesn't
make a difference." I read and re-read these words from Oscar Romero:
It
helps now and then to step back and take a long view.
The Kingdom is not only
beyond our efforts,
it is beyond our vision.
We
accomplish in our lifetime only a fraction
of the magnificent enterprise that
is God's work.
Nothing we do is complete, which is another way of
saying that
the kingdom always lies beyond us.
...
This
is what we are about. We plant the seeds that one
day will grow. We water the
seeds already planted
knowing that they hold future promise.
We lay
foundations that will need further development.
We provide yeast that produces
effects
far beyond our capabilities.
We
cannot do everything, and there is a sense of
liberation in realizing
this.
This enables us to do something, and to do it very well.
It may be
incomplete, but it is a beginning,
a step along the way, an opportunity for
the Lord's
grace to enter and do the rest.
We may never see the end results,
but that is the
difference between the master builder and the worker.
I wanted to believe Oscar Romero's words, and to
recognize myself as a worker and not the master builder, but I also heard and
re-heard Marianne Williamson's words:
Our
deepest fear is not that we are inadequate.
Our
deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure.
It
is our light not our darkness that most frightens us.
If indeed I had such power, why could I not figure
out how to use it to make this country a more just place? The question pestered
me and wore me out, so that even in my most successful venture, I felt
overwhelmed by all that I could not do.
So, I think that’s the truth. No wonder I had to
sleep all day. And no wonder it was in some sense a relief to leave the heavy burden of changing a giant system even as I left the joys of teaching.
Today, I’m rested and back to my more cheerful
self. How do I integrate that new awareness? Do I give up on seeking
socio-economic justice in my country?
No, I don’t think so, but somehow maybe with this
new chance, this new career, I can find a more soulful and humble way to find
peace in doing what I can.
I am getting, in some sense, a do-over. Or at least
a new-do.
Monday, July 1, 2013
Pride 2013
I celebrated the annual Pride
parade with my peeps in Seattle yesterday. Ann and I went to the parade route
an hour early with Rose, a long-time friend who was attending her
first pride parade. I wore the tank top I bought at the 1995 parade with a
triangle with the Space Needle in the center and Martin Luther King’s statement
that “No one is free until we are all free.” I also wore a plastic tye-dyed peace
sign as a pendent around my neck, a pendant that I found on the street after a
march a couple of years ago. (What, you don’t get your jewelry on the street?)
We found a nice spot on the
curb in the shade, and Rose treated us to tasty coffee cake from the Dahlia lounge
while we waited for the parade to start. Rose seemed a little nervous that we
might not be paying attention when the parade started, but I assured her that
we would hear the roar of the crowds and the bikes when the Dykes on Bikes, the
traditional openers to Seattle’s parade, approached.
We watched the parade from
our curb, and when our church—Wallingford United Methodist Church—approached,
we left the curb to join the march. The loudspeaker announced that our church
has been hosting gay weddings for almost thirty years. A young man from the
curb ran to the middle of our group to hug people and to say thank you. Our
friends Pea and Ally and Ally’s kids were on the sideline, too, and Pea ran up
for a bear hug.
It’s a feel good day, and
this year was particularly celebratory with the falls of DOMA and Prop 8. I
don’t know how many people were there to celebrate—thousands—but I only know of
one who was there to condemn the group to hell. Used to be more. This person
who was quoted in the paper saying that he only wanted to remind people of
Christ’s forgiveness reminded me of the already famous text from Mike Huckabee
on the day of the Supreme Court’s ruling: “Jesus wept.”
The verse that Huckabee uses
for his own purposes, from John 11, is the shortest in the Bible and records
Jesus’s response to the news that his friend Lazarus had died. More apt, and
less out of context, might have been Matthew 22: 35-40:
35 Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting
him, and saying,
36 Master, which is the great commandment in the law?
37 Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy
heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind.
38 This is the first and great commandment.
39 And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as
thyself.
40 On these two commandments
hang all the law and the prophets.
Those of us who are GLBTQ and
our supporters have so much to celebrate, but Jesus’s words and Martin Luther
King’s words, “No one is free until we are all free,” remind us that there is
still work to do:
As I celebrate this step
forward, I remember GLBTQ people in the states who have not yet adopted gay
marriage—or even worse, those in states that have passed constitutional
amendments making those marriages illegal. I remember my trans brothers and
sisters who have in many places not yet been accepted as healthy members of the
human community. I remember people in prison who should not be spending so much
of their lives behind bars. I remember immigrants to this country and refugees
from so many countries torn by war. There are so many more to name and to
remember.
Mike Huckabee’s foolish post,
“Jesus Wept,” on the day that DOMA was overturned reminds me that people who
coopt religious texts for their own purposes are a danger to freedom for too
many people in this world.
My MSW professor Scott Winn
at the beginning of second quarter said that his vision is to increase love in
this world.
That’s my vision, too. To
quote from John Lennon, another famous guy, “You may say I'm a dreamer, / But I'm not the only one. / I hope
someday you'll join us, / And the world will live as one.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)