This Labor Day marks the fourth year that I haven't
been part of the paid work force. Labor Day used to be the last day of summer,
the day before school started. I always worked on that day, getting ready for
the first week of school, and many of my colleagues buzzed about the building,
too. I imagine that lots of teachers are working today despite the myth that
teachers only work nine months and get summers off.
There is so much mythology in our culture around
work. One myth is that pay is commensurate with the amount of work a person
does. Not true. I had jobs where I got paid what to me was a substantial salary
and other jobs where I received a salary adequate for my lifestyle. I worked
hardest in the lowest paying jobs: teaching. Though these jobs were
under-resourced, I found the work more meaningful and more important than my
(much) better paid jobs. Because so much of my time, my life, was spent at
work, it seemed important to me to do work that felt important to me.
Today, The
Seattle Times published syndicated
columnist Gina Barreca’s opinion piece, “Trying to find your passion? Find a
decent job instead.” She has a point, that passion’s roots are in sacrifice not
selfish desire, but she misses the idea that the goal of work is…well, what is
it? Improving people’s lives or the world, adding to the generosity of spirit
in the world? Taking only photographs and leaving only footprints? Caring for
our own health and the health of others as much as possible? Creating a better
world for our young? Anyway, I would argue that the goal is not only or even
primarily making money.
I am more of the mind of Civil Rights Leader
Howard Thurman, who said, “Don’t ask yourself what the world needs; ask
yourself what makes you come alive, and then go and do that. Because what the
world needs is people who have come alive.” Where we mislead our young is where
we suggest that such life necessarily includes a hearty paycheck.
Since my brain tumors, I have not worked for any
paycheck at all, and so this means in this culture that I might choose not to
work, not to contribute. As I work with elders in assisted living and supported
living in their homes, I hear from others who no longer earn a living
financially, and are seeking still to live meaningfully. Too many of them, like
too many of us all, equate earning a living with earning money, and now that
they don’t need to do that—and in many cases cannot—they are at a loss for what
to do with themselves.
One woman with advanced dementia says to me every
time I talk with her, “Tell me, do I matter?” When I tell her she does, that
she makes my life better (and she does), she always continues, “Tell me how. I
need to know.”
Who are we and what value do we have when we no
longer work, either by choice or necessity? This is a question I have been
seeking to address in my own life since my brain tumors. And it is a question I
see so many others who can no longer work asking. Do we matter?
At church yesterday, our pastor Ann challenged our
congregation to “Labor for Love.” She challenged us to act in love. She never
mentioned how much money we should make or give. This was not her point. Her
point was that there is much work to do in the world and that we should get to
it.
She included as part of the service a poem from
Little Bit in the anthology Original
Voices: Homeless and Previously Homeless Women’s Writings. The poem, titled
“Life is..” begins by observing that life is “Movement” and continues with so
many different ways and reasons for movement, ending with these lines:
But I think
that sometimes
it's okay to
just sit,
Think,
And remember
What
Exactly
We
Move
for.
There it is again: purpose, meaning. Why are we
moving? Why are we working?
I make no money now, and I am privileged to
continue to be supported by savings, my partner, Social Security for people
with Disabilities, and health insurance (though the provider has lots of
incentives to try not to pay me, so they pay a third of my insurance to a
lawyer who makes them pay me the rest: it’s ridiculous.)
I also continue to work in the world, although I
can only work eight hours a week and am not financially compensated.
I lead poetry and narrative reading and writing
with elders. I work to build community in my church. I work strategizing with
other leaders at the University of Washington’s School of Social Work to
include Disability Justice in its curriculum and its culture.
When I left my career in education because I could
no longer do the work that my job required, my radiologist/oncologist
discouraged me from going to graduate school to work on a Masters in Social
Work. He said to me, ““You will probably not be successful in school. Even if you are, you
will probably not be able to get a job.” (I believe he was trying to protect me
from failure, but I was pissed.) He was thinking about a job. I was thinking
about work. They’re not necessarily the same thing.
I
am doing well in school, and as I approach graduation this December people keep
asking me what I’ll do after graduation.
I
begin with what seems obvious: “I will not get a regular job, not even a part
time one.” And then I continue with the ways I hope to work in the world: “I’d
like to support individuals or groups. I’d like to figure out how to use my
experience in teaching and my passion for writing to serve others.” I’d like to
help the world have more heart and soul. I’d like to connect with those the
world races past, people who are aging or slow or dealing with poor health,
addictions, trauma, and poverty. These people are worth noticing.
Like
me.
I believe you and I are more in agreement than you might be aware: I'm not suggesting that anybody work just for the sake of raking in the bucks but instead to do the work of the world, as Marge Piercy's poem suggests--and as YOU suggest, so that the world has more heart and soul. The more we can give of ourselves, our talents, our time and our efforts--even if it's not out of our deepest enthusiasms--are surely acts of grace? Thank you for your response to the column in the Seattle Times. All best wishes, Gina
ReplyDelete